As March Madness begins, Victoria E. Johnson teaches us how sports TV has changed over time

The Ohio State University today (March 14) filed a petition with the United States Supreme Court asking the justices to review a divided decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in order to preserve the statute of limitations for Title IX claims, which is foundational to the nation’s shared rule of law, and affirm the scope of federal education protections under Title IX.   

The petition asks the court to overturn a divided ruling by the Sixth Circuit that effectively eliminates the statute of limitations for Title IX, allowing claims that are decades old to move forward, and potentially expands Title IX to anyone who steps foot on a campus – even the 100,000 visitors to a football stadium on game day. Four judges on the Sixth Circuit disagreed with that ruling or expressly urged the Supreme Court to review it.  

Unless the Supreme Court intervenes, the Sixth Circuit’s ruling will negatively impact educational institutions that accept federal funds and are subject to Title IX of the Education Amendments, as well as students of these institutions.  

The Ohio State petition asks the Supreme Court to: 

• Uphold its commitment to statutes of limitations that begin when an injury occurs – not decades later.  
• Preserve Title IX’s protection of students who are denied educational opportunities or benefits – rather than individuals who visit campuses for other reasons, such as to attend sporting events.  

“If left to stand, [the ruling] will produce enormous uncertainty for educational institutions as well as victims of alleged abuse on the accrual of Title IX claims, and effectively penalize schools for investigating decades-old conduct,” the petition says. 

Ohio State’s petition does not question survivors’ accounts of sexual abuse by former Ohio State doctor Richard Strauss and does not diminish Ohio State’s commitment to supporting survivors. Strauss was employed by Ohio State from 1978 to 1998 as a physician treating students, primarily student-athletes. He died in 2005. Ohio State has led the effort to investigate and expose Strauss’ abuse and the university’s failure at the time to prevent it, and the university has reached settlement agreements with nearly 300 survivors, more than half the plaintiffs. 

“Ohio State condemns the reprehensible conduct underlying these lawsuits, has committed substantial resources to preventing and addressing sexual misconduct on campus, and is a fundamentally different institution today than it was 25 years ago,” the petition states.  

In March 2018, Ohio State received a report from a former student-athlete about sexual abuse by Strauss decades earlier. Ohio State took the allegations seriously and acted immediately. Less than one week later, Ohio State announced an investigation and notified the Columbus Division of Police. Perkins Coie LLP was retained to conduct an external, independent investigation.

Since February 2019, the university has covered the cost of professionally certified counseling services and other medical treatment to Strauss survivors and their families for as long as needed. It has also reimbursed costs for pre-existing counseling and treatment related to Strauss. This is offered through Praesidium, which has extensive experience providing confidential and sensitive support services. No contact with the university is required, and Praesidium will not share identifying information with Ohio State. The university will continue to cover the full cost of counseling services and provide other forms of institutional support even as it pursues this case in the U.S. Supreme Court. Additional details are available on the Strauss investigation webpage.

The university has embraced and enhanced stringent compliance standards separate and apart from its response to Strauss. Over the past 25 years, Ohio State has made robust changes to its culture and policies to protect students, faculty and staff. A comprehensive list of initiatives over the past 25 years is available on the university’s Office of Institutional Equity website.  

Although the two-year statute of limitations had long expired, Ohio State offered survivors the opportunity to settle their lawsuits for substantial amounts.    

The majority of the survivors settled their claims. Ohio State provided more than $60 million to 296 individuals through a trauma-informed approach that did not require survivors to prove they were harmed through any litigation process such as discovery or depositions. Ohio State has sincerely and persistently tried to reconcile with survivors through monetary and non-monetary means, and all male students who filed lawsuits have been offered the opportunity to settle. The remaining plaintiffs who were male students rejected monetary offers and continue to pursue their legal claims.    

A federal trial court dismissed those claims in 2021 because the two-year statute of limitations had long ago expired.    

But in a divided decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit last year ruled that the cases could move forward, effectively extending the statute of limitations by decades. The Sixth Circuit ruling also expanded Title IX protections to non-students.  

Four judges of the Sixth Circuit either disagreed with that decision or expressly invited the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case, as Ohio State is now requesting.   

The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that statutes of limitations are not simply technicalities but are vital to the legal system. They have been upheld by justices from Antonin Scalia to Sonia Sotomayor.    

Last year, seven universities that collectively educate 200,000 students joined Ohio State in petitioning the Sixth Court to reconsider its decision and preserve the two-year statute of limitations and Title IX’s focus on students.  

“By effectively eviscerating the statute of limitations for Title IX claims, the panel’s opinion puts schools in the impossible position of being forced to defend against claims where the only evidence remaining may well be the plaintiff’s say-so,” they wrote in the amici curiae brief.   

If the Supreme Court grants the petition, it would hear the case during its next term, which begins in October, and likely issue a ruling in 2024. If the Supreme Court does not review the case, it will be remanded back to the trial court for further legal proceedings. 

Ohio State continues to commit resources to prevent and address sexual misconduct, including policies, programs, staffing and tools. Anyone who has experienced sexual misconduct while at Ohio State – and the incident involved another student or university employee – is encouraged to report to the Office of Institutional Equity, the university’s anonymous reporting service or law enforcement. 

Those who have experienced sexual misconduct outside of Ohio State should contact local law enforcement. Additional resources include: 

• If you reside in the Columbus, Ohio, area, advocates from SARNCO can assist you in reporting, explain the investigation process and support you. SARNCO’s confidential, 24/7 support hotline is 614-267-7020.
• If you do not reside in the Columbus area, you can contact the RAINN National Sexual Assault Hotline, a confidential, 24/7 resource, at 1-800-656-HOPE (4673). You can also visit the website to chat live with a representative. Advocates will help you find a resource in your community. 

Current Ohio State students seeking additional support services can contact the Office of Student Life’s Counseling and Consultation Service, while faculty and staff can access support resources through the Employee Assistance Program. 

Students, researchers and leaders from The Ohio State University as well as business and community leaders recently helped open the temporary home of the George Washington Carver Science Park’s (GWCSP) Starlab terrestrial analog facility.

Experiment shows that even large, old, and presumably stable stores of soil carbon are vulnerable to warming and could amplify climate change.

The ePortfolio platform provides a central location for all Ohio State students, faculty and staff to showcase their academic and professional achievements.

As winter snowstorms, high winds and freezing temperatures caused myriad power outages throughout the United States in late December 2022, an obvious question was raised: Why can’t the energy grid handle such emergencies?

As winter snowstorms, high winds and freezing temperatures caused myriad power outages throughout the United States in late December 2022, an obvious question was raised: Why can’t the energy grid handle such emergencies?

As winter snowstorms, high winds and freezing temperatures caused myriad power outages throughout the United States in late December 2022, an obvious question was raised: Why can’t the energy grid handle such emergencies?

As winter snowstorms, high winds and freezing temperatures caused myriad power outages throughout the United States in late December 2022, an obvious question was raised: Why can’t the energy grid handle such emergencies?

As winter snowstorms, high winds and freezing temperatures caused myriad power outages throughout the United States in late December 2022, an obvious question was raised: Why can’t the energy grid handle such emergencies?